Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19795 (ORI)

BANAMBER MISHRA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/14979/2026 · 2026-05-19

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 14979 of 2026 Banamber Mishra ..... Petitioner Mr. B. Satapathy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 19.05.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “In the facts and circumstances of the case, the humble petitioner fervently prays this Hon'ble Court to be graciously pleased to issue notice to the Opp. Parties, call for relevant records and after hearing the counsel of the parties, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ commanding Opp. Party No.1 to regularize the service of the petitioner in the wages establishment and release his pension and pensionary benefits in terms of decision rendered in the case of Narusu Pradhan -V- State of Orissa (O.A. No.1189(C) of 2006 confirmed by this Hon'ble Court on 11.06.2009 and in terms of decision render in the case of Sarat Chandra Mishra -V- State of Odisha & Others (W.P.(C) No.1333 of 2022) within a stipulated period; Page 2 of 2. And/or pass such other order or direction as deems fit and proper in the interest of justice; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound, ever pray.” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti