2026:JHHC:20041 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6339 of 2026 Md. Altaf, Son of Khalil Miyan @ Khalil Ansari … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate --- 02/8th July 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 71 of 2026 for the offence registered under Section 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of BNS and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of Information and Technology Amendment Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Case, Deoghar. 2. During the course of argument, it transpired that the investigation is still going on and the petitioner is in custody since 11.05.2026. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this bail application at this stage. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has no objection to the prayer made for withdrawal. 5. However, the learned counsel for the parties have jointly submitted that whenever a fresh case is filed, it has to be treated as tied up matter in 2026:JHHC:20041 2 view of order passed by Hon’ble Division Bench in B.A. No. 3828 of 2017 vide order dated 09.04.2018. 6. After having recorded as the aforesaid, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this bail application. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawal. 8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e-mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 08.07.2026 Uploaded On: 11.07.2026 Mukul/-