Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19790 (AP)

PasamHari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/2828/2021 · 2026-01-22

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010172612021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2828/2021 Between: 1.PASAMHARI,, S/O ANJINEYULU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 4/12, CHINNAPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, PENUKONDAMANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2.PASAMRAMANJINAMMA,, W/O ANJINEYULU, AGED ABOUT 53, R/O D.NO. 4/12, CHINNAPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, PENUKONDAMANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3.PASAMANJINEYULU,, S/O THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT , R/O D.NO. 4/12, CHINNAPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, PENUKONDAMANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4.P. KALAVATHI,, W/O BOYATHIRUPAL, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, R/O 28-2-755-1, NAVODAYA COLONY, ANANTAPUR. 5.P. RAJESWARI, D/O ANJINEYULU, AGED ABOUT 19, R/O D.NO. 4/12, CHINNAPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, PENUKONDAMANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6.BOYATHIRUPAL,, S/O NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O 28-2-755-1, NAVODAYA COLONY, ANANTAPUR. 7.PASAMRAMANJINEYULU,, S/O THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 4-12, CHINNAPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, PENUKONDAMANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 8.PASAMNAGENDRA,, S/O THIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 43, R/OD.NO. 4-12, CHINNAPAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, PENUKONDAMANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT ARNARAVATHI. RESPONDENT. NO.1 2.ANKENAGAMANI, RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 3/90, CKPALLI, VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.K SRINIVAS 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 23.01.2026 VTS