( 2026:JHHC:20278 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6035 of 2026 Ugan Mohli, Aged about 55 years, S/o Bahabir Mohli @ Mahaveer Mohli, R/o Village- Udayapur, Block- Gandey, PO and PS- Gandey, District- Giridih. … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nagmani Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Govind Ray Karn, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, APP --- 05/09.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2026 in connection with Gandey P.S. Case No.59 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 103 (1), 3(5), 238 of the B.N.S. 2023 and the case is pending in the court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Giridih. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody 17.03.2026 and the charge-sheet has been submitted under Section 108 BNS, 2023. 4. He further submits that as per the FIR lodged by son of the deceased, it is alleged that he was working outside and was informed that his mother has been found dead on account of such incidence which had taken place on 02.10.2025 and upon coming back on the basis of the information which he collected he lodged the FIR and the petitioner is the named accused. 5. Learned counsel further submits that there is no material against the petitioner to connect him with the alleged offence and as per the FIR, the deceased was assaulted and the same was the reason of cause of death and she was found hanging, but there is no ante-mortem injuries. 6. The learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for regular bail and submitted that post-mortem examination has been conducted and she died because of asphyxia due to hanging. However, the fact that there is no ante-mortem injuries in the other parts of the body is not in dispute . ( 2026:JHHC:20278 ) 7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and further, no ante-mortem injury having been found on the body of the deceased/ victim and the charge-sheet has been submitted under Section 108 BNS, 2023, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Giridih, in connection with Gandey P.S. Case No.59 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 9. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 10. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 09.07.2026 Uploaded 11.07.2026 sandeep/