SUMEET KAKKAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MINI SECRETARIAT SECTOR 9 CH
CWP/16320/2026 · 2026-05-22
Namit Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19783 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19783 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-16320-2026 (O&M) IN THE H
Sumeet Kakka State of Punjab
CORAM:
Present:
NAMIT KUM
1.
Articles 226/2 quashing im similarly situ been granted has been soug legal notice da
2.
his grievances (Annexure P further submi appropriate di the said legal n
3.
&M) (1)
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH
Kakkar
Versus Punjab & others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAM
Mr. Vishal Mittal, Advocate, for th (through Video Conferencing).
KUMAR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been 226/227 of the Constitution of India, mpugned order dated 05.03.20 uated employees, who had earlie d fresh/revised station allotment n sought for directing the responden tice dated 11.12.2025 (Annexure P-3).
Learned counsel for the petitione vances, the petitioner has also served re P-3) to the respondents which is s submits that at this stage, the peti iate directions are issued to the respo legal notice, by passing a speaking ord Notice of motion.
JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CWP-16320-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2026
...Petitioner
...Respondents NAMIT KUMAR , for the petitioner
been filed by the petitioner under India, seeking a writ of certiorari for 026 (Annexure P-5), whereby er been refused promotion, have t. Further, a writ of mandamus ondents to consider and decide the 3). titioner submits that for redressal of erved legal notice dated 11.12.2025 ch is still pending consideration. He e petitioner would be satisfied, if respondents to consider and decide ing order, in a time bound manner.
026
nder r y e amus e the al of 5 . He d, if ecide VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.22 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CWP-16320-2026 (O&M)
4.
accepts notice innocuous pray
5.
through the rec
6.
present petitio consider and d by the petition an opportunity weeks from th decision taken
22.05.2026 Vimal
&M) (2)
Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Pu notice on behalf of the respondents-St us prayer made by learned counsel for I have heard learned counsel fo the record of the case. Without going into the merits o petition is disposed of with a dire and decide legal notice dated 11.12.2 etitioner expeditiously, by passing a rtunity of hearing to the petitioner, pr rom the date of receipt of certified co taken thereon shall be conveyed to the
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No G, Punjab, who is present in Court, State. He has no objection to the sel for the petitioner. nsel for the parties and have gone erits of the case at this stage, the a direction to respondent No.2 to 1.12.2025 (Annexure P-3) submitted ing a speaking order after affording ner, preferably within a period of 06 fied copy of this order. Further, the d to the petitioner.
(NAMIT KUMAR)
JUDGE
ourt, o the gone , the to itted rding 6 , the VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.22 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.