Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19782 (PNJ)

ANUJ NIRWANI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/13903/2025 · 2026-05-12

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

232 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ANUJ NIRWANI STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE Present: Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 528 BNSS and all other enabling provisions for issuance of writ/direction in the nature of mandamus or such other appropriate writ/direction directing official resp and personal liberty of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner has already been decided. In view of the the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. 12.05.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ANUJ NIRWANI VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 528 BNSS and all other enabling provisions for issuance of writ/direction in the nature of mandamus or such other appropriate writ/direction directing official respondent No.2 to and personal liberty of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner has already been decided. In view of the statement given by learned cou the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRWP-13903-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 12.05.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 528 BNSS and all other enabling provisions for issuance of writ/direction in the nature of mandamus or such other appropriate ondent No.2 to ensure the protection of life Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner has already been decided. statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE (O&M) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 528 BNSS and all other enabling provisions for issuance of writ/direction in the nature of mandamus or such other appropriate ensure the protection of life Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation nsel for the petitioner, HIMANSHU 2026.05.13 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document