( 2026:HHC:33312 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. PT. No. 44 of 2026 Decided on: 10th August, 2026 Suneel Kumar ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Chandranarayana Singh, Dr. Nidhi Singh, Mr. Anshul Gandhi and Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Mr. Ashish Kohli, Director School Education is present in person. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a copy of office order dated 10.08.2026 passed by the Director School Education, Himachal Pradesh, which is taken on record. 2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order reveals that the petitioner has been offered appointment as Junior Office Assistant (IT) against the post reserved for Ex-Serviceman, in 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:33312 ) 2 Pay Level-4 of the Himachal Pradesh Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2022, on contract basis, with effect from the date on which other similarly situated nominated candidates were appointed i.e. w.e.f. 18.06.2018, on notional basis with seniority and pay fixation, but without payment of past arrears. However, the same is subject to the final outcome of any legal remedy/proceedings, including any appeal, review petition, Special Leave Petition or any other proceedings pending or that may be instituted before any competent Court of law in the matter. 3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 04.11.2025 passed in CWPOA No. 6772 of 2020, titled, Suneel Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others has duly been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated the present petition and the same is disposed of as having been fully satisfied. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 10th August, 2026 Judge (naveen)