Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19775 (RAJ)

ABHISHEK S/O SHRI ASHOK KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SAW/1425/2025 · 2026-01-20

Sangeeta Sharma, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2348-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1425/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14625/2025 Abhishek S/o Shri Ashok Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Plot No. 18, Balaji Vihar, Near Nangal Jaisa Bohra, Post Jhotwara, Jaipur. ----Appellant/Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Department of Information Technology And Communication, I.T. Bhawan, Yojana Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, Through Chairman State Agriculture Management Institution Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Naveen Joshi on behalf of Mr. Govind Sharma HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 20/01/2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant fairly submits that the issue raised in the present appeal stands already adjudicated by Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.960/2025 (Vijay Kumar Choudhary & Anr. vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board & Ors.) along with other connected appeals decided on 26.09.2025 where after having examined the law, the Court has concluded as under : [2026:RJ-JP:2348-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-1425/2025] “19. The expert committee having examined the answer key and arrived at a reasoned conclusion leaves no scope for interference by this Court in the exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Given the well-settled principles governing judicial review of answer keys in public examinations, the learned Single Judge was justified in declining to interfere with the findings of the expert committee more so, in absence of challenge to the material relied by the expert committee.” 2. In view of the above, the present Special Appeal (Writ) is also dismissed, mutatis mutandis. 3. All pending applications stand disposed of. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ AMIT/9