( 2026:JHHC:20152 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6281 of 2026 Sandeep Kumar Ram @ Sandeep Ram son of Shibrt Ram @ Shivbrat Ram … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhash Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Ganesh Ram, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, APP --- 02/08.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026, S.T. Case No. 182 of 2026, G.R. No. 324 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 108, 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Latehar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the FIR, there is an allegation that the informant (father of the deceased) had given certain amount to the husband of the deceased and was asking for the refund on account of which the deceased (wife of the petitioner) was being assaulted. It is further alleged that the petitioner and other family members used to make allegation against the deceased having illicit relationship with her father-in-law as well as brother-in-law of the deceased. The petitioner is the husband and as per the FIR itself he was working in West Bengal. The marriage was solemnized in the year 2020 and there are two children out of the wedlock. The petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2026 and charge has been framed, but no witness has turned up so far. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail, however, the aforesaid submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner which is apparent from the FIR itself has not been disputed. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that charge has been framed and the petitioner ( 2026:JHHC:20152 ) 2 was working outside in the State of West Bengal and he has two children out of the wedlock, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Latehar, in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026, S.T. Case No. 182 of 2026, G.R. No. 324 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 08.07.2026 Uploaded on 10.07.2026 Binit/