( 2026:JHHC:20046 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (C) No. 5119 of 2023 ----- 1. Pramod Kumar Jayaswal, Son of Late Jugal Kishore Jaiswal, Resident of Gola Road, Boddom Bazar, P.O. Hazaribagh, P.S Sadar & District- Hazaribagh. 2. Amrita Jaiswal, wife of Pramod Kumar Jayaswal, Resident of Gola Road, Boddom Bazar, P.O. Hazaribagh, P.S. Sadar & District- Hazaribagh. 3. Piyush Kumar Jayaswal, Son of Late Jugal Kishore Jaiswal, Resident of Gola Road, Boddom Bazar, P.O. Hazaribagh, P.S. Sadar & District- Hazaribagh. 4. Poonam Sahabadi, W/o Abhay Sahabadi, R/o Doctors’ Lane, Makatpur, P.O, P.S. & District-Giridih. .… Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, Project Building Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand). 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S. & District- Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 3. The Additional Collector, Hazaribag, P.O. and P.S.-Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand) 4. The Circle Officer, Katkamdag, P.O.- Sultana B.O., P.S.-Katkamdag, District:- Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 5. Sri Shashi Bhushan Singh, S/o not known to the petitioner, at present resident and posted as Circle Officer, Katkamdag, P.O.-Sultana B.O., P.S.-Katkamdog, District:- Hazaribag (Jharkhand) … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chanchal Jain, Advocate : Mr. Anjani Kr. Verma, Advocate For the respondent(s) : Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate …...... 09/07.07.2026: I.A. No. 14265 of 2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this interlocutory application. 2. Accordingly, this I.A. is dismissed as withdrawn. W.P (C) No. 5119 of 2023 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the encroachment proceeding has already been culminated, he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to challenge the same by filing an appropriate application. ( 2026:JHHC:20046 ) 2 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. This writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the order of encroachment. 6. If the said appeal is filed along with the petition for condoning the delay, the same will be considered sympathetically and it is expected that the appeal should be disposed of on merits after hearing the parties. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 07.07.2026 Rashmi/-