Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19768 (JHR)

GOVIND KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5741/2026 · 2026-07-09

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:20324 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5741 of 2026 Govind Kumar, Son of Manoj Chauhan … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P. For the Informant : Ms. Tanu Kumari, Advocate --- 06/09.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Bishrampur P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026 for the offences registered under Sections 103(1), 238, 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned JMFC, Palamau at Daltonganj. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.01.2026 and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner is a co-villager and he has nothing to do with the family of the deceased. The learned counsel submits that there is an allegation that the husband of the deceased had relationship with another lady and conspiracy was hatched to kill the deceased. He submits that similarly situated co- accused namely Lala Kumar has been enlarged on bail by this court in B.A. No. 2813 of 2026 vide order dated 29.04.2026. 4. Learned counsel for the informant and opposite party-State have opposed the prayer for bail and have submitted that on the basis of tower location it has come that the petitioner was also present at the place of occurrence. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the co-accused has been enlarged on bail and the petitioner is neither a family member nor related to the family of the victim in any manner, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the ( 2026:JHHC:20324 ) 2 satisfaction of learned JMFC, Palamau at Daltonganj, in connection with Bishrampur P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 09.07.2026 Uploaded on 10.07.2026 Binit/