SRI MUDALAGIRIYAPPA v. DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC
WA/397/2024 · 2026-06-05
D K Singh, T M Nadaf
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19767 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19767 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26755-DB WA No. 397 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 397 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI MUDALAGIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS B NO 494, DODDABALLAPURA DEPOT REP BY GENERAL SECRETARY KSRTC AND BMTC UNITED EMPLOYEES UNION NO.23, 4TH MAIN ROAD, MATHIKERE EXTENSION BANGALORE 560 054 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ADITHYA KASTURKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ADITYA D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC, RAMANAGARA DIVISION KIMCO BUILDING MYSORE ROAD, DEEPANJALINAGAR BANGALORE 560 026 …RESPONDENT (BY Ms. RENUKA H R., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24/08/2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.12302/2022, ETC.
Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26755-DB WA No. 397 of 2024
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present intra Court appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 24.08.2023 passed by the writ Court in W.P.No.12302/2022 (L-KSRTC) filed by the respondent /Corporation.
2. The appellant was employed as a Conductor in the respondent/KSRTC (for short 'the Corporation'). He faced disciplinary enquiry in respect of the act of misconduct. The charge was proved in the enquiry. On 31.07.1993, the Disciplinary Authority inflicted punishment on the appellant for stopping of one annual increment for a period of six years with cumulative effect. This order of punishment came to be challenged by the appellant/workman in the year 2014 i.e., after 21 long years. Strangely, the Industrial Tribunal vide
order dated 14.06.2021 set aside the order of punishment inflicted on the appellant on 31.07.1993.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26755-DB WA No. 397 of 2024
3. The said award passed by the Industrial Tribunal was challenged by the respondent/Corporation by filing W.P.No.12302/2022. The learned Single Judge has noted the fact that the Industrial Tribunal has set aside the award of punishment, which was inflicted on 31.07.1993 after 21 long years, for which the industrial dispute was raised.
4. We therefore, find no ground or error to interfere with the impugned judgment and order dated 24.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge, which is why we dismiss this appeal.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
NG CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21