Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19767 (JHR)

MURARI MOHAN THAKUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/348/2025 · 2026-07-07

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 289 of 2025 --------- RAGHUNATH MAHTO, son of Late Baijlal Mahto, aged about 45 years, resident of Kumardaga, P.O. Kumardaga, P.S. Pindrajora, Chas, District Bokaro, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Chandra Shekhar (IAS), Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration & Land Reforms, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi. ....Opp. Parties With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 348 of 2025 --------- MURARI MOHAN THAKUR, son of Mangal Thakur, aged about 44 years, resident of Tupara, P.O. & P.S. Pindrajora, District Bokaro, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Chandra Shekhar (IAS), Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration & Land Reforms, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi. ....Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Rinku Bhakat, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Binit Chandra, A.C. to AAG-III --------- 11/Dated:-07.07.2026 1. It has been fairly submitted by learned counsel for the respective petitioners that appointment letter has been issued. 2. Accordingly, the order has been complied with some delay; however, this Court does not want to proceed on contempt for delay. 3. Accordingly, both these applications stand disposed of without any further orders. (Deepak Roshan, J.) JULY 7, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 10/07/2026