[2026:RJ-JP:1720] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7582/2025 Harphool @ Phoolaram son of late Shri Hemaram Rolaniya, aged about 60 Years, resident of Village Sabrampura, Police Station Kalwar, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Hansraj son of Kajjuram, aged about 35 years, resident of Gori Ka Bas, Via Renwali, Post Dungaripur, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Aswal with Mr. Kuldeep Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the proceedings in Criminal Case No. CIS No.17827/2014 pending before learned Additional Civil Judge and Metropolitan Magistrate, No.6, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur arising out of FIR No.2/2012 registered at Police Station Kalwar, District Jaipur (West) for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. After registration of the aforesaid FIR, the police conducted investigation in the matter and filed charge-sheet against the petitioner before the learned trial Court for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. [2026:RJ-JP:1720] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7582/2025] 3. On 20.01.2018, both the parties filed an application for compounding the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. It is stated in the application that in the spirit of Lok Adalat, the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and entered into a compromise. 4. The trial Court partly allowed the application and permitted to compound the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC vide order dated 20.01.2018 but the prayer in respect of other offences was not accepted as the same are not compoundable. 5. In these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of this petition to quash the proceedings in aforementioned case on the ground that the parties have resolved their dispute. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor does not dispute the factum of compromise. 7. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner; the material made available for perusal of this Court; considering the fact that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably, this Court is of the view that in order to establish peace and harmony between the parties and in order to let them live peacefully in the future life, and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], the proceedings in Criminal Case No.CIS No.17827/2014 pending [2026:RJ-JP:1720] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7582/2025] before learned Additional Civil Judge and Metropolitan Magistrate, No.6, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur are liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties although the remaining offences alleged to be made out in the instant case are not compoundable. 8. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Criminal Case No.CIS No.17827/2014 pending before learned Additional Civil Judge and Metropolitan Magistrate, No.6, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur arising out of FIR No.2/2012 registered at Police Station Kalwar, District Jaipur (West) are quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 9. The stay application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /73