- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27253 CRL.P No. 2344 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2344 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. MR. SYED ZAHID ALI AGE ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O SYED MOHAMMED 2. MRS. SHAHNAZ ALI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS W/O SYED ZAHID ALI BOTH ARE PRESENTLY R/AT NO.8/1, ROBERTSON ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005. …PETITIONERS [BY SRI MOHAMMED THOUHEED, ADVOCATE FOR P1 (AB); SRI NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE FOR P2 (AB)] AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY PULAKESHINAGAR POLICE STATION REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560 001. 2. MR. RAHAMATH ALI JUNG AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE MUMAZ ALI R/A PORTION OF NO.28, ROBERTSON ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27253 CRL.P No. 2344 of 2019 OLD ADDRESS NO.875, SLV UNIVERTH COMPLEX APTS, HBR LAYOUT 4TH BLOCK, 9TH MAIN ROAD, HENNUR CROSS, BENGALURU-560 047 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1; SRI IMRAN PASHA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.50227/2019 PENDING IN THE FILE OF THE XI ACMM, MAYO HALL BANGALORE AT ANNEXURE A AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.261/2017 BEFORE I RESPONDENT POLICE AT ANNEXURE B AND C RESPECTIVELY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.420,465,468,471 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC REGISTERED WITH PULKESH NAGAR POLICE STATION. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Though matter was passed over and called again, there is no appearance on behalf of petitioners. 2. Perusal of order sheet would indicate that interim order though granted initially was not extended from 07.04.2026. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27253 CRL.P No. 2344 of 2019 3. Learned HCGP for respondent no.1-State submitted that matter is presently pending before trial Court, awaiting orders from High Court. 4. Even on previous occasion, there was no appearance on behalf of petitioners and even cost imposed for seeking adjournment is not paid. This would indicate that petitioners are not diligently pursuing petition. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4