APHC010166772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8593/2025 Between: 1. TALARI DHARMENDRA KUMAR, S/O NAGARATNAM, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC DIET CONTRACTOR, R/O D.NO. 3-11-36, KONDAIAHPETA, PEDDAPURAM TOWN, PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MEDICAL AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT DIET MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY JOINT COLLECTOR, O/O DISTRICT COLLECTORS OFFICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR HOSPITAL SERVICES, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. THE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, PEDDAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent No.2 in not confirming tender for supply of diet to the inpatients of Respondent no.4 despite the Petitioner being the successful tenderer and the action of the Respondent No.4 in issuing with the proceedings vide Rc. No. SPL/Jl/2025, dated 13.03.2025 with ambiguity and havoc as nothing but illegal, arbitrary, erroneous, highhanded and violative of Article 14 and 24 of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to permit the Petitioner to supply the diet to the inpatients of the Respondent No.4 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A K KISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Tarun, learned counsel representing Sri A.K.Kishore Reddy, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the matter became infructuous and no further orders are required to be passed in this petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 27.01.2026 DDvvss HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 128 WRIT PETITION NO: 8593/2025 27.01.2026 DDvvss