[2026:JHHC:20367] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5858 of 2026 ------ Rajdeo Yadav, aged about 51 years, S/O Late Tilak Yadav, R/O Village – Suyadih, P.O. – Pesam, P.S.- Birni, District – Giridih (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Ayub Ansari, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, Addl.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocate ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-09-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Birni (Bharkatta) P.S. Case No.92 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 308(5), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder Saryu Prasad Verma by assaulting him by means of rod, sword and danda and demanded extortion of Rs.50,000/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been granted the privileges of anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.07.2026 passed in A.B.A. No. 3569 of 2026. It is further submitted that the dispute between the parties is basically a land dispute regarding construction of cow shed and the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is next submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.04.2026 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-6 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in connection with Birni (Bharkatta) P.S. Case No.92 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 09.07.2026 Saroj/