APHC010160532023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3258/2023 Between: 1. JYESHTA SUSMITHA, D/O JYESHTA SESHAGIRI RAO, W/O DUGGIRALA SUBHRAMANYAM,AGED 27 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O PLOT NO. 207, AKSHARI EMPIRE, ANIL INN RESTAURANT BACK SIDE, VALANDAPETA, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KAKARLA SATISH, S/O BANGARU RAO, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 2-74-B, RAMALAYAM STREET, POCHAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. KAKARLA VENKATESWARARAO, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED 56 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 2-75/D, RAMALAYAM,POCHAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. KAKARLA VENKATA SUBBARAO, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED 72 YEARS,R/O D. NO. 2-72/A, POCHAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. DUGGIRALA PARAMESWARARAO, S/O RAMANNA, AGED 56 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 1-77/C, RAMALAYAM STREET, POCHAVARAM VILLAGE, TALLAPUDI MANDAL,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. KONDEPATI KASI VISWANADHAM, S/O RATNAJIRAO, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O 1-40/1, POCHAVARAM VILLAGE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 6. MANDA GOVINDA RAJU GOVINDU, S/O VEERRAJU, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 1-80/C, POCHAVARAM VILLAGE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. UKKUSURI SIVAJI, S/O ARAVALU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 3- 103/1, RAMALAYAM VEEDI, TALLAPUDI MANDAL,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. CHERUKURI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O DHARMARAO, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 3-103/1, RAMALAYAM VEEDHI, POCHAVARAM, TALLAPUDI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. KAKARLA SATYA SRINIVASARAO, S/O VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED 43 YEARS,R/O D. NO. 2-72, RAMALAYAM STREET, POCHAVARAM VILLAGE, TALLAPUDI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. AT PRESENT RESIDING IN FLAT NO. 502,VISHUNUMAYUKA APARTMENTS, OLD GAJUWAKA,VISAKAPATNAM. 10. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENTS: Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to cancel the pre-arrest bail granted on 14.07.2021 in Crl.P.No.3427 of 2021 in Cr.No.307 of 2021 of Kovvur Town Police Station and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. P VIVEK Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3258/2023 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed seeking cancellation of the pre-arrest bail granted to the respondent Nos.1 to 9/Accused Nos.1 to 9, on 14.07.2021 in Crl.P.No.3427 of 2021 in Cr.No.307 of 2021 of Kovvur Town Police Station. 2. Heard Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri P.Vivek, learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant, Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 9 and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. As can be seen from the record, the respondent Nos.1 to 9/Accused Nos. 1 to 9 were granted anticipatory bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Crl.P.No.3427 of 2021 vide order dated 14.07.2021, wherein two conditions were imposed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner preferred the present petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail on the ground that the petitioners failed to comply with the conditions i.e., the condition not to enter into village till filing of charge sheet. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the respondent Nos. 1 to 9/accused Nos.1 to 9, have complied with the conditions imposed by 4 the Coordinate Bench of this Court till filing of charge sheet. Charge sheet is filed in this matter. The matter is pending before the concerned Court for trial. 6. The report received from the Court would show that because of the order of stay dated 27.11.2023 passed in I.A.No.2 of 2023 in Crl.P.No.9203 of 2023 before this Court which is preferred by the accused seeking quashment, which is being extended from time to time, the learned Magistrate could not commit the case to the Sessions Division. 7. In the light of the above, in absence of any violation of conditions imposed, while granting bail to the respondents/accused Nos. 1 to 9, this is not a fit case for cancellation of the bail. 8. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.02.2026. UPS 5 326 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3258/2023 Dt.27.02.2026 UPS