1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 11 of 2026 1 - Rajju Verma S/o Toran Verma Aged About 29 Years R/o Village - Korda, P.H. No.- 29, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, (C.G.) (Correct Age Mentioned) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Kashiram S/o Chedam @ Ramgopal Verma Aged About 73 Years R/o Village- Korda, P.H. No.- 29, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, (C.G.) 2 - Dwarika S/o Chedam @ Ramgopal Verma Aged About 62 Years R/o Village- Korda, P.H. No.- 29, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, (C.G.) 3 - Shrimati Ayodhya D/o Chedam @ Ramgopal Verma Aged About 70 Years R/o Village- Korda, P.H. No.- 29, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, (C.G.) 4 - Shrimati Sita D/o Chedam @ Ramgopal Verma Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Korda, P.H. No.- 29, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, (C.G.) 5 - Shrimati Ganga D/o Chedam @ Ramgopal Verma Aged About 58 Years R/o Village- Korda, P.H. No.- 29, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, (C.G.) 6 - Shrimati Rambati D/o Chedam @ Ramgopal Verma Aged About 74 Years R/o Village- Korda, P.H. No.- 29, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, (C.G.) 7 - Punitram S/o Ramsahay Verma Aged About 74 Years R/o Village- Koliha, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 8 - Santram S/o Anurudh Sahu Aged About 52 Years R/o Village- Lavan, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 9 - Kirit S/o Anurudh Sahu Aged About 56 Years R/o Village- Lavan, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 10 - Ramgopal S/o Anurudh Sahu Aged About 43 Years R/o Village- Lavan, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 11 - Shrimati Kirtan Bai D/o Anurudh Sahu Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Lavan, Rnm And Tehsil- Lavan, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) PAWAN KUMAR Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR Date: 2026.01.08 18:02:53 +0530 2 12 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate For State : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, PL Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 08/01/2026 After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit is pending since 2024 more than one year has been passed therefore, a direction may be issued to the trial Court to conclude the suit within a reasonable period of time. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Court is not inclined to issue a mandatory direction to the trial Court to conclude the suit within a fixed time frame. However, considering the nature of dispute, it is expected that the trial Court shall make an earnest endeavour to expedite the trial and conclude the proceedings at the earliest possible. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE Pawan