Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19738 (KAR)

SMT BETTAMMA v. SRI PUTTAMADEGOWDA

WP/4178/2022 · 2026-06-08

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27086 W.P. No.4178/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.4178/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BETTAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKAMADEGOWDA @ KUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS. 2. SRI. MADA @ MADEGOWDA S/O LATE CHIKKAMADEGOWDA @ KUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. 3. SRI. RAMU @ RAMEGOWDA S/O LATE CHIKKAMADEGOWDA @ KUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 4. SRI. T.K. NAGARAJU S/O LATE CHIKKAMADEGOWDA @ KUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT TURUGANURU VILLAGE BANNUR HOBLI, T. NARASIPURA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT 571101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SATISH K, ADV.,) Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27086 W.P. No.4178/2022 AND: SRI. PUTTAMADEGOWDA S/O CHIKKANAMADEGOWDA, MAJOR SINCE DEAD REP. BY LEGAL HEIRS. 1. SRI. MADHUKAR S/O LATE PUTTAMADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 2. SMT. MADAMMA W/O LATE PUTTAMADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS. ALL ARE R/AT: TURUGANURU VILLAGE BANNUR HOBLI, T. NARASIPURA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT – 571101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BAIJU STEPHEN, ADV., FOR SRI. R.A. DEVANAND, ADV.,) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, T. NARASIPURA, MYSORE IN EXECUTION NO.4/2020. QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN EXECUTION NO.4/2020 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, T. NARASIPURA, MYSORE FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN ANNEXURE-C IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27086 W.P. No.4178/2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER This petition is filed challenging the proceedings in Execution No.4/2020 pending on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC, T.Narsipura, Mysore (for short ‘the trial Court’). 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/Decree holders submits that the writ petition has become infructuous as the possession of the property has been delivered in terms of the decree and therefore, nothing survives for consideration. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31