[2026:JHHC:20342] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5389 of 2026 ------ Jaskaran Singh, aged about 20 years, S/o Ravel Singh, Resident of Vill- VPO Khabbe, Rajputana teh Baba Bakla P.O.- Khabee, P.S.- Mehta Chowk, Distt. Amritsar, Punjab .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-09-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with M.G.M. P.S. Case No.172 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 115 (2), 103 (1), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has committed the murder of maternal uncle of the informant namely Pratap Singh. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-11 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the post-mortem report goes to show that there is no ante-mortem injury found on the dead body of the deceased and the opinion regarding the cause of death has been kept reserved pending the Viscera Report but the Viscera Report has not yet been obtained. It is further submitted that the absence of any external ante-mortem injury on the dead body, falsifies the claim of the informant that the petitioner and the co-accused brutally assaulted the deceased. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.05.2026 passed in B.A. (Filing) No.10790 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.11.2025 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with M.G.M. P.S. Case No.172 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-09.07.2026-Animesh/