Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19733 (AP)

V.Pasamalar v. The District Water Management Agency

WP/24349/2013 · 2026-03-11

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.24349_2013 APHC010167552013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24349/2013 Between: 1. V.PASAMALAR,, S/O CHENGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT (UNDER TERMINATION), SADASIVA SANKARAPURAM PANCHAYAT, NAGALAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. R/O H.NO.3/6, S.S.PURAM VILLAGE & POST, NAGALAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 2. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/, PROGRAMME OFFICER, NREGS, NAGALAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the declaring the proceedings issued by the 1st respondent in notice No.K6/5368/2012, dated 25.11.2012 as illegal, arbitrary, suffers from non application of mind, contrary to G.O.Ms.No.98, dated 9.3.2010, contrary to Circular dated 27.1.2010, contrary to orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.14121 of 2009 and batch dated 7.7.2010 and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Field Assistant under 2 HN, J W.P.No.24349_2013 N.R.E.G. Scheme of Sadasiva Sankarapuram Panchayat, Nagalapuram Mandal, Chittoor District, with all consequential and incidential benefits attached to the post IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 29959 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by the 1st respondent in notice No.K6/5368/2012, dated 25.11.2012 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 HN, J W.P.No.24349_2013 ORDER: 1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned proceedings passed by the Project Director. As per the impugned proceedings, an appeal lies before the District Collector within the time specified therein. 2. However, the petitioner has approached this Court without filing an appeal before the appellate authority. 3. In view of the above, this Court finds no grounds to interfere in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:12.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.24349_2013 17 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24349 of 2013 Date: 12.03.2026 NKA