Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
30.01.2026 Serial no. 31 [G.S.D]
CRM (M) 2164 of 2025
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 222 of 2024 arising out of Belur Police Station Case No. 85 of 2024 dated 19.05.2024 under Min cerimine mise Sections 302/201 of the IPC.
-And-
In the matter of : Md. Shajada @ Rohit
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Sk Toslim Ali
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Partha Pratim Das Ms. Sana Naaz
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for one year eight months and from the month of May, 2025, no witnesses are being produced by the prosecution. Learned advocate for the State, on the other hand, submits that there is heinousness attached to murder of the deceased. It has been informed that 12 witnesses have already been examined by the prosecution and, presently, the prosecution intends to examine three more witnesses. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the prosecution has taken a decision to reduce the number of witnesses, last opportunity is granted to the
2 prosecution so that remaining three witnesses are completed within three months, thereafter, Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. be completed and the learned trial court would put in efforts so that by 31st July, 2026 the verdict is pronounced by the learned trial court. Having regard to the totality of the circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Accordingly, CRM(M) 2164 of 2025 is dismissed. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)