Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19726 (RAJ)

SANTOSH W/O SANWARMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14947/2025 · 2026-01-30

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4427] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14947/2025 Santosh W/o Sanwarmal, R/o Dhani Dala Ki Tan Village Jhadli, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sogarwal with Mr. Sahil Hussain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 30/01/2026 1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.124/2025 registered at Police Station Thoi, District Sikar for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2) & 126(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the charge-sheet submitted against other co-accused. 4. As per the contents of FIR, there is no allegation against the present accused-petitioner of causing any particular injury to the complainant party. The accused-petitioner is a woman and her husband has already been arrested and was enlarged on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:4427] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14947/2025] 5. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this matter. 6. On perusal of the injury report of the injured-Manju Devi, she said to have sustained as many as 7 injuries and all are by blunt weapon. Only one injury i.e. injury No.4 has been opined to be grievous in nature and the same was attributed to other co- accused. In the statement of the injured-Manju Devi, there is no allegation against the present accused-petitioner of using any weapon or wooden stick for causing any injury to the injured. 7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the accused-petitioner is a woman and there is no specific allegation against her in the FIR, the Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner. 8. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioner named above in connection with FIR No.124/2025 registered at Police Station Thoi, District Sikar shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or [2026:RJ-JP:4427] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14947/2025] indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /244