CHANDAN YADAV ALIAS CHANDAN KUMAR DUBEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5809/2026 · 2026-07-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19720 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19720 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:20366] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5809 of 2026
------ Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Durbey aged about 22 years, son of Sudhir Darve, resident of village Kairabani, P.O. & P.S. Jama District Dumka Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Supriya Dayal, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-09-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Masalia P.S. Case No.44 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery at the gunpoint and looted Rs.6,000/- and mobile phone of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but without putting him under T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that two witnesses have been examined in this case during the trial and neither of them has supported the case of the prosecution and they have been declared hostile. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.01.2026 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Dumka in connection with Masalia P.S. Case No.44 of 2022 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 09.07.2026 Saroj/