Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19717 (CHH)

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. (MINOR) SANJANA KURRE

MCC/485/2026 · 2026-05-13

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22761 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 485 of 2026 1 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Through Divisional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Address- Gitanjali Bhawan, Old Bus Stand, Korba, Tahsil And Distt. Korba (C.G.) (Insurer) ... Applicant versus 1 - (Minor) Sanjana Kurre D/o Late Heera Lal Kurre Aged About 7 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Grand Father Sudhram R/o Village Devarmal, Thana- Urga, Tahsil And Distt. Korba (C.G.) 2 - (Minor) Sidharth Kurre S/o Late Heera Lal Kurre Aged About 3 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Grand Father Sudhram R/o Village- Devarmal, Thana- Urga, Tahsil And Distt. Korba (C.G.) 3 - Sudhram Kurrey S/o Late Ramcharan Kurre Aged About 56 Years R/o Village- Devarmal, P.S.- Urga, Tahsil And Distt. Korba (C.G.) (Appellants Of Mac No. 374/2023) 4 - Uttam Tiwari S/o Ranglal Tiwari R/o Patharripara (Dabripara) Korba, Tahsil And Distt. Korba (C.G.) (Respondent No. 1 Of Mac 374/2023) 5 - Gautam Tiwari S/o Ranglal Tiwari R/o Patharripara (Dabripara), Outpost- Rampur, Tahsil And Distt. Korba (C.G.) (Respondent No. 2 Of Mac 374/2023) ---- Respondents For Applicant : Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 14.05.2026 REKHA SINGH -2- 1) Heard on application for correction in order dated 27.02.2026 passed in MAC No.374 of 2023 and one connected matter. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the applicant/Insurance Company would submit that in para 8, facts of MAC No.392 of 2023 have been considered but due to typographical mistake, it has been mentioned as MAC No.932 of 2023. It is further submitted that in para 11, this Court assessed the compensation with regard to MAC No.374 of 2023 but just above the chart due to mistake, MAC No.392 of 2023 has been mentioned. She would contend that in para 12, instead of MAC No.392 of 2023, MAC No.374 of 2023 may be substituted. 3) Heard. 4) The contention made by Ms. Agrawal appears to be fair and reasonable. Accordingly, same is allowed. MAC No.932 of 2023 mentioned in para 8 shall be read as ‘MAC No.392 of 2023’ and in para 12, MAC No.392 of 2023 shall be read as ‘MAC No.374 of 2023’. 5) Accordingly, MCC is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha