VIJAY KUMAR CHOPRA (deceased) through LRs v. SUDESH KUMAR
CMPMO/438/2026 · 2026-08-13
Virender Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19709 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19709 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:34151 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No. : 438 of 2026 Decided on : 13.08.2026 Vijay Kumar Chopra (deceased) through LRs. …Petitioners Versus Sudesh Kumar …Respondent The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : None.
Virender Singh, Judge
(Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the petition, with liberty to approach the competent Court of Law, under the relevant provisions of the HP Urban Rent Control Act,
1987. Considering the above facts, leave and liberty as aforementioned is granted. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Virender Singh) 13th August, 2026
Judge (Pramod Kumar) 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.