Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19708 (AP)

Kilari Sridevi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7112/2019 · 2026-02-05

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010164292019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 7112/2019 Between: 1. KILARI SRIDEVI, W/O KILARI RAVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 11-407/2, NAGARALU, 2 LANE, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KROSURU POLICE STATION, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. KILARI GOPAL RAO, S/O. VENKATESHWARLU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O. BALEMARRU VILLAGE, KROSURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK KARIMULLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7112 OF 2019 ORDER: No one appeared for the writ petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the writ petitioner. 2. Sri R.Mallikharjuna Rao, learned A5ssistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that police completed investigation in Cr.No.193/2018 of Krosuru Police Station, Palnadu District, and the investigation reveals that the matter is of civil in nature and therefore, it was referred as ‘civil in nature’ vide proceedings dated 30.11.2022. In that view of the matter, the writ petitioner has to approach proper forum for necessary redressal in accordance with law, and the writ petition is not maintainable. 3. It appears that the writ petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 06.02.2026 PSK 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 61 WRIT PETITION No:7112 OF 2019 Date: 06.02.2026 W PSK