APHC010162492023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 8396/2023 Between: 1. NEELI NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O VENKATESWARARAO, AGE R/O METAL RAOD, KALIDINDI, KALIDINDI MANDAL, ELURU DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, , REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND. URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SECRETARIATE, SECRETARIATE BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE MACHILIPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, , REP BY ITS VICE CHAIRPERSON, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DIST. 3. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KALIDINDI GRAMAPANCHAYAT. KALIDINDI, ELURU DIST. 4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, ELURU DIST, ELURU. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents trying to demolish the total structures in Ground floor of the petitioner building in R.S.No. 758/14 in Kalidindi Village, Eluru Dist , to which permission is granted by the 3rd respondent vide B.P.No. 15/2020 dated 13.10.2020 , is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and violation of Article 14 , 21 and 300(A) of p. 2 SRS,J Constitution of India and further direct the respondents not to demolish the structures in the Ground floor of the petitioner's above building and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of demolition of entire constructions in the Ground floor of the petitioner building in R.S.No. 758/14 in Kalidindi Village, Eluru Dist , to which permission is granted by the 3rd respondent vide B.P.No. 15/2020 dated 13.10.2020 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri T. Sharan, learned counsel representing Sri T.V.V. Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the writ petition has rendered infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 20.01.2026 IKN p. 3 SRS,J 128 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 8396 of 2023 Date: 21.01.2026 IKN