KRISHNA KUMAR @ KRISHNA KUMAR DANGI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6395/2026 · 2026-07-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19705 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19705 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:20389 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6395 of 2026
------ Krishna Kumar @ Krishna Kumar Dangi, aged about 25 years, S/o Amirika Dangi, R/o Village-Lowagadda, PO-Unta, PS-Chatra Sadar, Distt.-Chatra, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Prasad, Advocate
: Mr. P.S. Dayal, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 09-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pathalgadda P.S. Case No.09 of 2026 corresponding to NDPS Case No.77 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 17(b), 18(b), 21(b), 25, 27, 28 & 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act and Section 112(2)(b) of BNS,
2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 51 grams of brown sugar which is also known as Heroin. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the seized brown sugar comes under intermediate quantity. It is also submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet and report from the forensic science laboratory has not been received as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.02.2026 as is evident from para-13 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail
of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS, Chatra in connection with Pathalgadda P.S. Case No.09 of 2026 corresponding to NDPS Case No.77 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09/07/2026 Abhiraj/