IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14471 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-910 Year-2024 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Vishal Kumar S/o Vimal Singh R/o Village - Chakpitamberpur (Bhikhnad), P.S - Fatuha, District - Patna 2. Niranjan Kumar S/o Indrajeet Singh R/o Village - Chakpitamberpur (Bhikhnad), P.S - Fatuha, District - Patna 3. Suranjan Kumar S/o Indrajeet Singh R/o Village - Chakpitamberpur (Bhikhnad), P.S - Fatuha, District - Patna 4. Ashok singh @ Chuha Singh @ Ashok Prasad S/o Late Rambriksh Prasad @ Boka Singh R/o Village - Chakpitamberpur (Bhikhnad), P.S - Fatuha, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Moni Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 24-06-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners are apprehending his arrest in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 910 of 2024 for the offence under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 329(3) and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of Arms Act lodged on 18.12.2024 by the informant, Dinanath Kumar. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that due to the land dispute, the accused persons armed variously, assaulted and also opened fire. The said assault led to fracture in both the hands, the shoulder as also the butt. When Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14471 of 2026(5) dt.24-06-2026 2/2 they were convinced that the informant is dead, left the place. This led to the FIR. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that admittedly, there is a land dispute, the informant is a criminal while the petitioners do not have any criminal antecedent, number of accused persons have been roped in and the allegations are omnibus in nature. 5. Learned counsel representing the State, on the other hand, has taken this Court to the injury report that is part of the case diary to show that it has been found to be grievous in nature inasmuch as bony fracture was indeed found. 6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the injury report, no relief can be extended to the petitioners. 7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. 8. If, however, the petitioners surrender within four weeks, the concerned Court shall take up the matter and dispose it of preferably on the same day. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T