Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19700 (KAR)

SRI NAGENDRA K v. THE MANAGEMENT OF

WP/55293/2016 · 2026-06-08

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27101 WP No. 55293 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8516 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 55293 OF 2016 (L-TER) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 8516 OF 2016 (L-TER) IN WP No. 55293/2016 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. HARISH, S/O. SRI MUNIRATHNAPPA, (DELETED AS PER COURT ORDER) 2. SRI. NAGENDRA K., S/O. SRI. KALYANI HUGA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT PAVAN GURU NILAYA, NO.374/2, S.L.N. ROAD, K.R.LAYOUT, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 3. SRI. GAJENDRA G.H., S/O. SRI HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT C/O SHIVANNA BUILDING, VADDARAPALYA VILLAGE, HARIGUDDI POST, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 4. SRI. JAGADEESHA, S/O. SRI BYREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27101 WP No. 55293 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8516 of 2016 R/AT C/O. PRABHU SHANKAR, NO.147, K.R.LAYOUT, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 5. SRI. PARAMANANDA R. DODDAMANI, S/O. SRI. BENCHAPPA, (DELETED AS PER COURT ORDER) 6. SRI. M.REDDY PRAKASH, S/O. LATE M.REDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT C/O. PRABHU SHANKAR, NO.147, K.R. LAYOUT, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 7. SRI. NOOR BEIG G.F., S/O. SRI. FAKRULLA BEIG, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT C/O. PRABHU SHANKAR, NO.147, K.R.LAYOUT, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105, BENGALURU DISTRICT 8. SRI. SHIVAKUMAR N. UPPAR, S/O. SRI. NINGAPPA UPPAR, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT C/O. SHIVANNA BUILDING, VADDARAPALYA VILLAGE, HARIGUDDI POST, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105 BENGALURU DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAIK V.S., ADVOCATE, (VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 23.11.2022, WP IN RESPECT OF PETITIONERS NO.1 AND 5 ARE DISMISSED)) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27101 WP No. 55293 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8516 of 2016 AND: THE MANAGEMENT OF TATA ADVANCED SYSTEMS LIMITED, (EARLIER KNOWN ARE TATA ADVANCED MATERIALS LIMITED), REGISTERED OFFICE AND FACTORY, AT NO.10, JIGANI INDUSTRIAL AREA, JIGANI, BENGALURU-560105. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER(HRD & ADMN). …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. IN WP NO. 8516/2016 BETWEEN: 1. THE MANAGEMENT OF TATA ADVANCED SYSTEMS LIMITED, (EARLIER KNOWN ARE TATA ADVANCED MATERIALS LIMITED), REGISTERED OFFICE AND FACTORY, AT NO.10, JIGANI INDUSTRIAL AREA, JIGANI, BENGALURU-560 105. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (HRD AND ADMN). ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. HARISH, S/O. SRI MUNIRATHNAPPA, (DELETED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 07.12.2022) - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27101 WP No. 55293 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8516 of 2016 2. SRI. NAGENDRA K., S/O. SRI. KALYANI HUGA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT PAVAN GURU NILAYA, NO.374/2, S.L.N. ROAD, K.R.LAYOUT, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 3. SRI. GAJENDRA G.H., S/O. SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT C/O SHIVANNA BUILDING, VADDARAPALYA VILLAGE, HARIGUDDI POST, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 4. SRI. JAGADEESHA, S/O. SRI BYREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT C/O. PRABHU SHANKAR, NO.147, JIGANI, K.R.LAYOUT, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 5. SRI. PARAMANANDA R. DODDAMANI, S/O. SRI. BENCHAPPA, (DELETED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 07.12.2022) 6. SRI. M.REDDY PRAKASH, S/O. LATE M.REDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT C/O. PRABHU SHANKAR, NO.147, JIGANI, K.R.LAYOUT, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 7. SRI. NOOR BEIG G.F., S/O. SRI. FAKRULLA BEIG, - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27101 WP No. 55293 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8516 of 2016 AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT C/O. PRABHU SHANKAR, NO.147, JIGANI, K.R.LAYOUT, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105, BENGALURU DISTRICT 8. SRI. SHIVAKUMAR N. UPPAR, S/O. SRI. NINGAPPA UPPAR, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT C/O. SHIVANNA BUILDING, VADDARAPALYA VILLAGE, HARIGUDDI POST, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-560105 BENGALURU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAIK V.S., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 TO R8) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER IN WP No.55293/2016 Sri.V.S.Naik, counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Somashekar, counsel for the respondent have appeared in person. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27101 WP No. 55293 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8516 of 2016 IN WP No.8516/2016 Sri.Somashekar, counsel for the petitioner and Sri.V.S.Naik, counsel for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. Sri.Girish Kumar., DGM-HRD the authorized representative of the petitioner management and respondent No.2 - Mr.Nagendra K., respondent No.3 - Mr.Gajendra G.H., respondent No.4 - Mr.Jagadeesha., respondent No.6 - Mr.M.Reddy Prakash, respondent No.7 - Sri.Noor Beig G.F and respondent No.8 - Sri.Shivakumar N. Uppar are physically present before the Court and they have been duly identified by their respective counsel. 3. Counsel for the respective parties jointly submits that the petitioner and the respondents have amicably resolved the dispute and accordingly, they have filed a compromise petition. They submit that the compromise petition may be placed on record and the Writ Petitions may be disposed of in terms of the Compromise Petition. - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27101 WP No. 55293 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8516 of 2016 4. When queried by the Court, they submit that they have taken a conscious decision to settle the matter and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling/ modification of the order. 5. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the cheques are handed over to counsel Sri.V.S.Naik., in the open Court. Counsel Sri.V.S.Naik., acknowledges the receipt of the cheques in the open Court. 6. The oral submission made by the respective parties and the Compromise Petition is placed on record. 7. The Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of the Compromise Petition. 8. In view of disposal of the Writ Petitions in terms of the Compromise Petition, the award dated:06.11.2015 passed by the Court of III Addl. Labour Court, Bengaluru is modified in terms of Compromise Petition as far as the petitioner and respondents are concerned. - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27101 WP No. 55293 of 2016 C/W WP No. 8516 of 2016 Because of disposal of the Writ Petitions, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27