Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:895-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 428 of 2022 1 - Illias Ansari S/o Late Yasin Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Siraz Kadri S/o Mohd. Niyazuddin Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Mohd. Fazal S/o Mohd. Sakeel Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Izmaam @ Izmamul @ Babu S/o Modh. Illias Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Mohd. Mozid Ansari S/o Imamuddin Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Suhail S/o Mohd. Sakeel Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 7 - Mohd. Shakeer Ansari S/o Mohd. Kutubuddin Ansari Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Zenul Haq Julaha S/o Naizahuddinaged Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 9 - Mustakeem S/o Mohd. Haffimuddin Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 10 - Saleem Ansari S/o Ishaak Ansari Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 11 - Mainullah Ansari S/o Illias Ansari Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. 12 - Gayasuddin S/o Gani Julaha Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Ara, Chowki Bariyon, Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh. VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2026.01.08 18:42:54 +0530
2 13 - Mohd. Shamim Ansari S/o Mohd. Islamuddin Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kundikalan, Police Station Lundra, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioners versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police Station , Lundra , District Sarguja Chhattisgarh.
--- Respondent
(Cause title is taken from the CIS) For Petitioners : Shri Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Nitansh Jaiswal, Deputy, GA Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice and Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge
Order on Board Per
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
07.01.2026
1. Heard Shri Shakti Raj Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Shri Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy. Government Advocate for the State/Respondent.
2. By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioners have made the following prayer :
“It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 02/02/2022 passed in Crime No.03/2022 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court (POCSO Act), Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.), Annexure -P/1, in the interest of justice. AND t is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the proceedings of Crime No.03/2022 registered at Police Station Lundra, District Surguja (C.G.) so far as it relates to the addition of offences U/s 354 of
3 IPC & Section 8 of POCSO Act, against the petitioners in the interest of justice.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that since the petitioners have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, therefore, prayer No.1 has become infructuous. He would next contend that so far as the prayer No.2 for quashing to proceedings of the present case is concerned, since the trial is in progress and only two prosecution witnesses are left for being examinined by the trial Court, therefore, he does not want to presss this petition.
4. Learned State counsel did not oppose the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners.
5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, we do not find any good ground for quashing of the proceedings of Crime No.03/2022, registered at Police Station Lundra, District Surguja, (C.G.) so far at it relates to the addition of offences under Section 354 of IPC & Section 8 of the POCSO Act against the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha)
Judge Chief Justice Vasant