Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26396 RSA No. 891 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 891 OF 2026 (DEC/POS) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. CHINNAMMA W/O LATE VARADASHETTY, D/O LATE MADASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.
2.
SRI. CHIKKAMADASHETTY S/O LATE MADASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
3.
SMT. CHIKKAMMA W/O SHIVANNASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
4.
SRI. CHIKKASWAMY S/O LATE MADASHETTY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
5.
SRI. MAHADEVASWAMY S/O LATE, DODDAMADASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
6.
SRI. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE DODDAMADASHETTY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26396 RSA No. 891 of 2026
7.
SRI. GOPAL S/O MADASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
8.
SRI. SHIVANNA S/O LATE KAJJIMADASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
9.
SRI. CHIKKAKONGALLISHETTY S/O RAMASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT AMACHAVADI VILLAGE, HARADANAHALLI HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KASHINATH J.D., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI. NAGASUNDARA S/O LATE. MAHADEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
2.
SRI. A.M. SIDDARAJU S/O LATE. MAHADEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
3.
SRI. DODDABELLASHETTY S/O NANJASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT LINGAYATH STREET, AMACHAVADI VILLAGE, HARADANAHALLI HOBLI , CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26396 RSA No. 891 of 2026
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 9.04.2026 PASSED IN RA NO.8/2025 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHAMARAJANAGARA., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 4.01.2025 PASSED IN OS NO.47/2014 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHAMARAJANAGAR.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Cost imposed by this Court on 21.05.2026 is not paid. Application is filed seeking waiver of the cost imposed by this Court. No justification in waiving the cost. Since cost is not paid, appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 49