Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19697 (RAJ)

ANIL YADAV S/O RAMPAT YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15122/2025 · 2026-01-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2273] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15122/2025 Anil Yadav S/o Rampat Yadav, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jagdishpura Sarund, District Kotputli Behror. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Behror, Kotputli Behror). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Yadav For Complainant(s) For State : : Ms. Harshita Sharma for Dr. Mahesh Sharma Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.0201/2025 registered with the Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror for offence under Section 103(1) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3, 25, 25(6), 5 & 27 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely with the allegations that he facilitated the main accused who committed the murder of the deceased. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 05.08.2025 and the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge- sheet in the matter. Trial of the case will take time, therefore, the [2026:RJ-JP:2273] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15122/2025] petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, so also the allegation levelled against him and the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 05.08.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /71