Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19697 (AP)

THE DEPUTY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER v. TEKUMALLA NAGA KUMARI

WP/8694/2022 · 2026-02-22

Battu Devanand, Subhendu Samanta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010157832022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3565] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 8694/2022 & Review I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.14471 of 2019 Between: 1. THE DEPUTY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPT., A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. TEKUMALLA NAGA KUMARI, W/O LATE T.SHIVA NAGESWARA RAO, OR.C. SWEEPER (RETD) R/O. 24-2-1313, RAM NAGAR 1ST STREET, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT AUDIT OFFICER, STATE AUDIT, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, BALA BHAVAN, NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANACE AND PLANNING DEPT., A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI calling for the records relating to and connected with O.A.No.654/2016 dated. 12.12.2017 on the file of the Honourable Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and to quash or set aside the order dated.12.12.2017 made in OA.No.654/2016 by holding as erroneous and contrary to law and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the Certified Copy of the Order dated 12.12.2017 in O.A.No.654/2016 passed by the Honourable Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders dated. dated.12.12.2017 made in 0A.654/2016 on the file of the Honourable Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES III (AP) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION No.8694 OF 2022 & Review I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.14471 of 2019 COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) The writ petition No.8694 of 2022 is filed by the State against the order, dated 12.12.2017 passed in O.A.No.654 of 2016, on the file of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad (for short “Tribunal”). 2. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for 1st respondent would submit that the order of the Tribunal has been complied with and he placed a letter in Roc.No.1057/A5/2022-23, dated 10.02.2023 issued by the District Audit Officer, State Audit, Nellore to the District Educational Officer, Nellore District. 3. On perusal of the above said letter, it appears that the Pension Proposals of 1st respondent, who was retired from service on attaining the age of Superannuation on 30.04.2014, are forwarded so as to authorize the Pensionary benefits in favour of him. Accordingly, the learned counsel for 1st respondent would submit that as the order of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad has been already complied with, no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition. 4. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the appellants also endorsed the same. 5. In view of the above factual position, as the order under challenge in this writ petition has been already complied with by the appellants, in our 4 considered view, no further adjudication is required in this writ petition and it is liable to be dismissed. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 7. There shall be no order as to costs. Review I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.14471 of 2019: Consequent to the dismissal of the W.P.No.8694 of 2022, this Review Application is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND _____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated: 23.02.2026 PGR 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION No.8694 OF 2022 & Review I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.14471 of 2019 Dt. 23.02.2026 PGR