BHIM SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/31577/2024 · 2026-05-12
Surya Partap Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19694 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19694 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-31577
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 271
BHIM SINGH & ORS.
STATE OF PUNJAB &
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J.
question has already been quashed this Court in CRM the present petition has
2.
petition is hereby
12.05.2026 Vinod
31577-2024 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BHIM SINGH & ORS.
VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P
None for the petitioners.
**** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral):
The learned State Counsel has submitted that the FIR in has already been quashed, vide order dated 28.11.2025 passed by this Court in CRM-M-42350-2025 (on the basis of compromise the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of above, once the FIR no longer survives petition is hereby dismissed having become infructuous. 2026
(SURYA PARTAP SINGH
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-31577-2024 (O&M)
DECIDED ON: 12.05.2026
.....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS
.....RESPONDENT(S) SURYA PARTAP SINGH
The learned State Counsel has submitted that the FIR in vide order dated 28.11.2025 passed by on the basis of compromise), and that rendered infructuous. In view of above, once the FIR no longer survives, the present having become infructuous.
SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
(O&M) 2026
(S) (S) The learned State Counsel has submitted that the FIR in vide order dated 28.11.2025 passed by ), and that the present VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.13 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document