Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19694 (PNJ)

BHIM SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/31577/2024 · 2026-05-12

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-31577 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 271 BHIM SINGH & ORS. STATE OF PUNJAB & CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. question has already been quashed this Court in CRM the present petition has 2. petition is hereby 12.05.2026 Vinod 31577-2024 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH BHIM SINGH & ORS. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P None for the petitioners. **** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): The learned State Counsel has submitted that the FIR in has already been quashed, vide order dated 28.11.2025 passed by this Court in CRM-M-42350-2025 (on the basis of compromise the present petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of above, once the FIR no longer survives petition is hereby dismissed having become infructuous. 2026 (SURYA PARTAP SINGH Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31577-2024 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 12.05.2026 .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS .....RESPONDENT(S) SURYA PARTAP SINGH The learned State Counsel has submitted that the FIR in vide order dated 28.11.2025 passed by on the basis of compromise), and that rendered infructuous. In view of above, once the FIR no longer survives, the present having become infructuous. SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) 2026 (S) (S) The learned State Counsel has submitted that the FIR in vide order dated 28.11.2025 passed by ), and that the present VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.13 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document