ANISETTY VENKATESWARA RAO v. BUDITI RAJASEKHAR,I.A.S
CC/2096/2023 · 2026-03-15
D Ramesh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19694 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19694 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010161382023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2096/2023 Between:
1. ANISETTY VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. ADIYYA NAIDU, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR AND MATERIAL SUPPLIER, R/O. PLOT NO. 103, SURYA RESIDENCY, SURYA TEJAS NAGAR, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. BUDITI RAJASEKHAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT,
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, THULLUR MANDAL, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI KONA SASHIDAR I A S, THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NH-16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2
4. SRI B SUBBA REDDY, THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, PANCHAYAT RAJ, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. SRI K SRINIVASA RAO, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION,
MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE (MGNREG) SCHEME, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,
BHIMAVARAM. (FORMERLY ELURU)
6. SRI K RAMAKANTHA RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, NARASAPURAM CLUSTER, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT
GUARANTEE (MGNREG) SCHEME, NARASAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for willful violation of orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 39383 of 2022 dated 15-12-2022 delivered by Hon'ble Sri. Justice D. Ramesh and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. S NISCHALA REDDY
2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following:
3
ORDER: This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 15.12.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.39383 of 2022.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsels for both the parties submitted that the order dated 15.12.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.39383 of 2022, has been complied with and prays to close the contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:16.03.2026 GK
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
17
CONTEMPT CASE NO:2096 of 2023
Dated:16.03.2026
GK