SRI VENKATESWARA SCHOOL OF NURSING v. THE STATE OF AP
WP/8049/2025 · 2026-02-05
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19691 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19691 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
::1::
APHC010156572025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8049/2025 Between:
1. SRI VENKATESWARA SCHOOL OF NURSING, R.V.S.
NAGAR, MURAKAMBATTU POST, CHITTOOR - 517127 REPRESENTED BY ITS
VICE CHAIRMAN R.
VENKATASWAMY SRINIVAS
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY,
HEALTH MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. AMARAVATHI, HANUMANPETA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the
::2::
High Court may be pleased to issue any order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2ndRespondent in not receiving and processing the petitioner's application in relation to admission of two students in respect of General Nursing and Midwifery course (GNM course) as arbitrary and unconstitutional nd set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to accept the admission applications of two students for the GNM course for the academic year 2024-2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P BADRINATH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
::3::
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 8049 of 2025 This Court made the following ORDER:
Sri Ravi Teja, learned counsel representing Sri P. Badrinath, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
06.02.2026 Krk
::4::
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
57
WRIT PETITION No.8049 of 2025
06.02.2026
krk