Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19690 (RAJ)

DILRAJ @ DK S/O LAKHANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14853/2025 · 2026-01-08

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:641] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14853/2025 Dilraj @ Dk S/o Lakhanlal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Bijalpur, Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli, District Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Krishna Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, Public Prosecutor Mr. Himmat Singh for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 08/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.135/2025 registered at Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 140(2) & 351(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of threatening to the complainant for demand of ransom. 3. Learned counsel further submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.10.2025 and the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge-sheet. He also submits that with the motivation of the villagers, the parties have entered into a compromise. [2026:RJ-JP:641] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14853/2025] 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant verify the factum of compromise in between the parties and has placed before this Court a copy of an affidavit alongwith written compromise which are taken on record. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the parties have entered into a compromise and the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge-sheet, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /119