Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19690 (KAR)

SRI. SUDHAKAR SHANKAR KAMATE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CCC/958/2023 · 2026-06-04

Anu Sivaraman, Venkatesh Naik T

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26670-DB CCC No. 958 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.958 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. SRI SUDHAKAR SHANKAR KAMATE S/O. SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER AT MDRS, HOOLIKATTI BAILHONGAL BELGAUM-591 102. 2. SRI NAGARAJ R. SURYAVANSHI S/O. RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER AT MDRS NAGANUR VILLAGE AND POST GOKAK TALUK BELGAUM DISTRICT-591 306. 3. SRI SUDHAKAR S/O. MAHADEVA MUJAGOND AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS WORKING AS ENGLISH TEACHERS AT MDRS KOPPAL DISTRICT-583 231. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SMT. MANJANNA M.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA Digitally signed by ANJALI M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26670-DB CCC No. 958 of 2023 BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SRI RAKESH KUMAR K. I.A.S. OFFICER (SECRETARY) DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001. 3. SRI MANOJ JAIN I.A.S. OFFICER (SECRETARY) DEPARTMENT OF MINORITIES M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001. 4. NAVEEN KUMAR RAJU S. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY NO.179, RUPA COMPLEX 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR IST MAIN ROAD SESHADRIPURAM BENGALURU-560 020 AND ALSO AT 8, M.SB-1, 6TH AND 7TH FLOOR CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU-560 052. …ACCUSED (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR PROFORMA R-1; SRI SHRIDHAR PRABHU, ADVOCATE FOR A-4) * * * THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF THE CONTEMPT COMMITTED BY ACCUSED AND WILFUL DISOBEYING THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.8113-8131 OF 2015 C/W WRIT PETITION NO.9056-9065 OF 2015(S-RES) DATED 22-10-2019 AND PUNISH THEM FOR COMMITTING OF CONTEMPT OF COURT. THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26670-DB CCC No. 958 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) This Contempt of Court case is filed alleging non-compliance with the judgment (Annexure-A) dated 22.10.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge. 2. The learned counsel for the complainants submits that the directions have been complied with in respect of complainant Nos.1 and 3, but in respect of complainant No.2, the directions are yet to be complied with. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents/accused has placed on record a compliance affidavit dated 11.03.2026, wherein it is stated that the specific directions issued in the judgment (Annexure-A) have been complied with in full. 4. It is submitted that the service weightage, as directed by this Court, has been provided in respect of all the complainants. However, it is further submitted that, in respect - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26670-DB CCC No. 958 of 2023 of complainant No.2 alone, even if the service weightage is granted in full, she would not meet the eligibility criteria. The endorsement in this regard is produced as Annexure-R2, wherein it is stated as follows: "Therefore, as the marks obtained by the concerned individual are lower than the cut-off marks fixed by the Centralized Admission Cell for the post of Hindi Language Assistant Teacher, the candidate is not eligible for the post of Hindi Language Assistant Teacher. In light of all the above factors, as per the Society's Cadre and Recruitment Rules-2011, the High Court Order in W.P. No 8113-8131/2015 (S-RES) and other connected cases, and the Hon'ble Supreme Court Order in SLP No. 24994-24998/2023 and SLP No. 24767/2023, and the directions in Letter No: SWD/224/MDS/2025 dated: 20.09.2025; even after granting 15% service weightage and 1% proportionate weightage (Totaling 16 service weightage/proportionate service weightage), since you have obtained marks lower than the cut-off marks fixed for the Category-3B reservation for the subject of Hindi Teacher, it is hereby informed that there is no provision as per rules to select you for the post of Hindi Teacher." 5. Having considered the contentions advanced, we are of the opinion that, in light of the directions issued by this - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26670-DB CCC No. 958 of 2023 Court, the exercise directed by this Court has now been carried out by the respondents/accused and appropriate orders have been passed. The learned counsel for the complainants raises contentions against the said orders as well. 6. In the above view of the matter, the Contempt of Court case is closed, leaving open the contentions of the complainant on merits to be agitated in appropriate proceedings. 7. Notice issued to accused, if any, shall stand discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE AM List No.: 3 Sl No.: 23