Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19687 (JHR)

DIWAKAR YADAV @ DIVAKAR KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5057/2026 · 2026-07-09

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20308 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5057 of 2026 Diwakar Yadav @ Divakar Kumar Yadav, Son of Reva Yadav @ Reva Mahato … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, APP --- 05/09.07.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026, registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- cyber-crime, Special Judge, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.04.2026 and charge-sheet has been submitted today itself before the learned court. He submits the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that one Mobile phone and one SIM card are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and there are 4 crime links found during investigation and one victim is alleged to have supported the prosecution case. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to 2026:JHHC:20308 2 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- cyber- crime, Special Judge, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:09.07.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:10.07.2026