Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19683 (KAR)

PUTTASWAMY v. MOTEGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS

RSA/1547/2023 · 2026-06-03

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26235 RSA No. 1547 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1547 OF 2023 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. PUTTASWAMY S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGE 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE 2. RAMAKRISHNA S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGE 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF HOSASIDDAPURA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK - 577 301, SHIMOGA DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PRASAD B S.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1A. MOTEGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS VARALAKSHMI W/O MOTEGOWDA AGE 50 YEARS, 1B. MOHANA KUMARA S/O MOTEGOWDA AGE 30 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26235 RSA No. 1547 of 2023 1C. VINODA KUMARA S/O MOTEGOWDA AGE 28 YEARS, 1D. YASHODA D/O MOTEGOWDA AGE 26 YEARS, R/O DANDIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KARADAHALLI POST, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 445 2. BHADRE GOWDA S/O KARI GOWDA AGE 55 YEARS, 3. SMT. PUTTALINGAMMA W/O BHADRE GOWDA AGE 45 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF NANJAPURA ROAD, NEAR ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, HOSASIDDAPURA VILLAGE - 577 301, BHADRAVATHI TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.01.2022 PASSED IN EX. NO. 319/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHADRAVATHI DISMISSING THE EX. PETITION. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26235 RSA No. 1547 of 2023 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo. Memo reads as under; "That the as against the order of the R.A.40/2011 & O.S.392/1996. The CRP is maintainable. Hence the Appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal and liberty may be given to the appellant to challenge the above said order. Hence, this Memo". Placing the memo on record, the appeal stands dismissed with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30