Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19683 (AP)

KilariSridevi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7103/2019 · 2026-02-24

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010164242019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 7103/2019 Between: 1. KILARISRIDEVI, W/OKILARI RAVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 0CC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 11-407/2, NAGARALU, 2NCI LANE, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KROSURU POLICE STATION, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. KILARI GOPAL RAO, S/0. VENKATESHWARLU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 0CC. AGRICULTURE. 6. KILARI VIJAY SURESH KUMAR, S/O.GOPALA RAO AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 0CC. AGRICULTURIST. 7. KILARI SUSEELA, W/O.GOPALA RAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 0CC. HOUSE WIFE. 2 8. KILARI PUNNAMMA, W/O.LATE VENKATA NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 0CC. HOUSE WIFE 5 TO 8 ARE THE RESIDENTS OF BALEMARRU VILLAGE, KROSURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK KARIMULLA Counsel for the Respondents: 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7103 OF 2019 ORDER: No one appeared for the writ petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the writ petitioner. 2. Sri R.Mallikharjuna Rao, learned Asst.Govt.Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. It appears that the writ petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 25.02.2026 PSK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 156 WRIT PETITION No:7103 OF 2019 Date: 25.02.2026 W PSK