Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26851 W.P. No.16995/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.16995/2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI. HULUGAPPA S/O BHARMAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/AT. NEKAR COLONY NELIVAGILU VILLAGE, SHIKARIPURA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577427. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDESH H, ADV., [ABSENT])
AND:
1. MALLESHAPPA S/O BHARMAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS.
2.
HANUMANTHAPPA @ DANESHAPPA S/O BHARMAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS.
3. BASAPPA S/O BHARMAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
ALL ARE R/AT NEKAR COLONY NELIVAGILU VILLAGE SHIKARIPURA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577427. …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26851 W.P. No.16995/2021
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER DATED 25.08.2021 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SHIKARIPURA IN M.A.NO.03/2021, WHEREBY THE ORDER DATED 18.01.2021 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIKARIPURA IN O.S.NO.194/2020 IS SET ASIDE, ANNEXURE-A. CONFIRM THE
ORDER DATED 18.01.2021 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIKARIPURA IN O.S.NO.194/2020, WHEREBY THE INTERIM APPLICATION NUMBERED AS I.A.NO.1 THAT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IS AS ANNEXURE-B & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26851 W.P. No.16995/2021
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session.
The order sheet indicates that the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought adjournment on all the earlier dates of hearing and even notice is not ordered in the writ petition filed in the year 2021. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14