2026:JHHC:8407 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 232 of 2026 --------- Vishnu Singh @ Anda, aged about 25 years, Son of Harendar Singh, resident of Kitadih Gwalapati Near Sai Mandir, P.O. & P.S.-Bagbera, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:-25.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Section 313 of B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from this petitioner and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and two of the co-accused persons namely Pankaj Kumar @ Golu and Rahul Kumar @ Popo Bacha have already been granted bail by the learned Dist. & Addl. Sessions Judge-III at Jamshedpur in B.P. No.901 of 2025 and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 21.08.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and two of the co-accused persons have already been granted bail and that the petitioner is in custody since 21.08.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. No. 442 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) MARCH 25, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 30.03.2026