1 2026:CGHC:21113 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3933 of 2026 Rajesh Kumar Kashyap S/o Shri Lomesh Ram Aged About 59 Years Resident Of Patganva, Via-Pendra, Post And Police Station Pendra, District- Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indira Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 5 - Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development Department District Gaurela- Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 6 - District Education Officer District- Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 7 - Principal Government Gurukul School Pendraroad, Block Pendra, District Gaurela Pendra Marwahi, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.05.08 10:46:57 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Baldau Prasad Banjare, Advocate For State : Mr. Avinash Singh, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 06.05.2026 1. The present petition is filed by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to respondents for grant of regular pay scale to petitioner under the contingency services immediately on completion of 89 days of service from the initial date of appointment. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is in employment since 17.07.1989 and therefore, he is entitled for grant of regular pay- scale after completion of 89 days of service. He further submits that similar relief has already been granted to certain persons whose services were also regularized in the State Government in the year 2008. He refers to an order dated 10.03.2015 stating that the said order is in respect of identically placed persons. 3. At this juncture, learned State counsel submits that it would be better if the petitioner files detailed fresh representation to respondent no. 3 along with all relevant documents in support of his claim including the orders of the State Government as also the orders of the High Court in other concerned petitions. He further submits that in case representation is made, the respondent no. 3 shall decide the same 3 within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. 4. The proposal of the State Counsel is acceptable to the counsel for the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation to respondent no. 3 along with relevant documents in this regard and on such representation being made, respondent no. 3 shall dispose of the same within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the representation. 6. It is made clear the this Court has not expressed any opinion so far as the entitlement of the petitioner is concerned. The Authorities shall be free to take a decision purely in accordance with the rules governing the field. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- Alfiza (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge