[2026:RJ-JP:3814] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17834/2025 Mohan Lal Mourya S/o Late Govind Ram Mourya, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Gram Manoharpura, Ward No. 112, Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur- 302005. 2. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Secretary/deputy Commissioner Zone 9, Jaipur Development Authority, Ram Kishore Bhawan, Jln Marg, Jaipur-302004. 3. Mahavir Swami Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited, Jaipur, Through Administrator, Vijay Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Hardev Prasad Sharma, R/o 127, Shri Janakpuri-I, Imli Gate, Jaipur. 4. Govind Khandelwal S/o Shri Nathulaal Khandelwal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Plot No. 90 Arjun Nagar, Behind Dalda Factory, Durgapura, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Rathore For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 28/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that Your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ, order or direction:- 1. To restrain JDA taking any adverse action against the pe- titioner in respect of his respective plot; and 2. To issue necessary directions to the respondent JDA to compensate the petitioner for his loss at present land rates or allot a plot of same dimension in the same locality with the rate which petitioner at that time applied for the same; and [2026:RJ-JP:3814] (2 of 2) [CW-17834/2025] 3. To issue necessary directions to the respondent JDA not to create any third person rights over the said plot or to trans- fer or dilute or cancel the ownership of the petitioner. 4. To quash and set aside the illegal allotment orders dated 16.02.2020 and 18.02.2020 issued by the Jaipur Development Authority, in respect of the land including Plot No.105 situated in Shyam Vihar, Village Mahal, Jagatpura, Jaipur. 5. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner. 6. The cost of the writ petition may also be awarded in favour of the petitioner." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, upon instructions of his client, seeks permission to withdraw the present civil writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law. 3. Permission sought for is granted. 4. Accordingly, this civil writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. 5. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-14