Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 19673 (AP)

Sanivarapupeta Gram Panchayat v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/39358/2015 · 2026-01-07

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010164142015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 39358/2015 Between: 1. SANIVARAPUPETA GRAM PANCHAYAT,, ELURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SARPANCH SMT. K.LURDHAMMA W/O. LEELARAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 2. TANGALLAMUDI GRAM PANCHAYAT,, ELURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SARPANCH SMT. V.NAGESWARAMMA W/O. V.ARUNKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. 3. SATRAMPADU GRAM PANCHAYAT,, ELURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SARPANCH SMT. RANI NIRMALA KUMARI W/O. SWAMYDAS, AGED ABUT 43 YEARS. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, (A.P.E.P.D.C.L.), REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN-CUM- MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, A.P.E.P.D.C.L., WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AT ELURU. 4. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, A.P.E.P.D.C.L., WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AT ELURU. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, APEPDCL, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri K. Naga Phanindra, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K. Rathanga Pani Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, on instructions, submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Having noted the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:08.01.2026 Vns