AJAY MUNDOTIYA S/O SH. BABLU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14821/2025 · 2026-01-06
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19671 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 19671 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:128] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14821/2025 Ajay Mundotiya S/o Sh. Bablu, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Amba Colony Boraj, Police Thana Ganj, District Ajmer, (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Tyagi Mr. Saurabh Vaishnav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 06/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.229/2025 registered at Police Station Ganj, District Ajmer for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged incident is of 13.08.2025 and the FIR has been lodged on 18.08.2025 i.e. after 5 days of the incident for which, no explanation has been given by the complainant. He also submits that initially the FIR was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and after 5 days the injured was medically examined and thereafter, on the
[2026:RJ-JP:128] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14821/2025] basis of opinion of the Medial Jurist, the offence punishable under Section 109(1) of BNS, 2023 was added.
3.
Learned counsel further submits that there is no evidence as regards any kind of medical treatment of the injured from the period 13.08.2025 to 18.08.2025 i.e. before his medical examination.
4.
Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 01.10.2025 and the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge-sheet.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the Medical Jurist has given opinion that the injury No.1 attributed to the present accused-petitioner is dangerous to life.
6. On perusal of the challan papers, it is revealed that the alleged incident is of 13.08.2025 and the FIR has been lodged on 18.08.2025 and the injured has been medically examined on
18.08.2025.
7. It seems very unnatural that a person who has sustained injury which has been opined to be dangerous to life has not gone for any kind of treatment for last 5 days.
8. Taking into consideration the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
[2026:RJ-JP:128] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14821/2025]
9. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /103